Thinking about RC and libraries

April 26, 2017 by Andrew

Walking down Canal St, I found myself thinking about RC and “the future of education”. I’ve been doing some reflective thinking about my time at RC lately.

I’m captivated a bit by the idea that RC might predict the future of libraries. The batch model doesn’t map, but zooming out, RC is a place for self-directed study (there’s nuance around the difference between study and practice, where RC is both and maybe weighted to the latter, but both seem to fall into the category of self-improvement). And when you strip away the books and the borrowing of media, that’s what libraries feel like in my head: places to go to acquire knowledge in a self-directed way.

The community aspects of RC don’t necessarily map directly to existing libraries, but there are interesting possibilities there, too. The codes of conduct make sense (they do for any public environment, probably). But especially the ability to interact with others across (or filtered by) a broad set of interests. You’re learning something, and you have channels (Zulip, Community, the wiki) to learn from and ask questions of others. It doesn’t feel like the geography of one library matters all that much. The RC community is broadly distributed, and each individual library might just be an entry node into a broader community.

This seems even more relevant if the future includes massive shifts in the workforce and things like universal basic income. Libraries as community learning centers, where individuals can choose to develop their skills (and learn new ones), seems like a fairly natural focus. There will likely be room for more didactic education as well, but the (financial) motivator will be different.

© 2017 | Follow on Twitter